MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 22:03
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 139
59% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 446
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9676
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 32.1
24% 30.2 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 20.4
23% 29.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 400 385 364 379 223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 378
Write 391
Mixed 393
SusWrite 354
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 38.6
126% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 298
223% 297 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
641GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 111 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 117
Write 99
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 111
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
171% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 19.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback