TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 21:39
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 214
68% 127 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 439
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 58.1%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9676
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 32.7
24% 30.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 20.9
24% 31.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 24%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 218 170 292 324 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 458
Write 417
Mixed 408
SusWrite 257
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 41.4
131% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 313
231% 304 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 88.5%
 Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
641GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 110 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 115
Write 86.5
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 112
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
177% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 65.7%
 Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.6
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 65.5%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,468x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples1,300x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2,244x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,022x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples501x
SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples209x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples127x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples110x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples761x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples308x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples214x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback