MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 500
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9676
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 29.2
22% 27.8 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 18.5
22% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 395 191 218 282 276 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 397
Mixed 407
SusWrite 293
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 42.6
142% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 308
235% 319 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
641GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 113 115 114 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 81.3
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback