MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 24 months ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121026
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 109
54% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 235
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 66.4
56% 69.4 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 67.2
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 34 49 31 41 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 178
Write 142
Mixed 139
SusWrite 45
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 10.9
18% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 71%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
861GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 180 198 193 198 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 217
Write 200
Mixed 197
SusWrite 194
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 33.1
107% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 43.2
34% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 41 56 31 42 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66% Good
Read 181
Write 169
Mixed 87
SusWrite 48.4
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-E51(MS-7596) Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback