Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 20 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '22 at 15:08
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 169 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 304 45% 325 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.35 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46% Average	Lighting 55.5 Reflection 66.9 Parallax 58.1 45% 60.2 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 57.6 Splatting 52.3 47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C 252 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 455 Write 421 Mixed 333 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 38.6 143% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 73 114% 219 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 576GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 162 163 164 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 160 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 162 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 20.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 19.8 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5305 G/C184 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x

SSD
PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10CSSDBench 68%, 252 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	6x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBMicronBench 62%, 35 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16