Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 21 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '22 at 11:11
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$72 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 194 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 382 48% 365 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.35 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.2% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 58 45% 60.1 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 53.2 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C 252 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 21 24 32 31 93 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.7% Average	Read 26.4 Write 5.2 Mixed 84.1 SusWrite 35.8 9% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 24.3 119% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 94.2 DQ Mixed 81.8 69% 101 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 406GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 145 142 139 131 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 138 Write 146 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 139 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.5% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 19.1 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 14.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5305 G/C184 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $72Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x

SSD
PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10CSSDBench 68%, 252 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	6x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBMicronBench 62%, 35 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16