AZW U55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW U55  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U55
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 98.9
52% 80 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 164
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 4.7
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 128GB 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2012XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 59 66 44 42 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 467
Write 325
Mixed 342
SusWrite 50.2
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 17.2
94% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 21.8
71% 150 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JT000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 113 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 124
Write 133
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 109
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 80%
SDXC Card 1TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 10 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 13.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 13.9
17% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 26%
WDC WD20 EADS-00S2B0 2TB
604GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.8 5.1 4.9 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 34.9
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 5
34% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
125GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 33 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 33.9
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 32.4
45% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U55 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback