AZW U55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW U55  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U55
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime16.7 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 96.7
48% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 164
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 128GB 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2012XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 66 73 27 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 421
Write 206
Mixed 120
SusWrite 59.9
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 5.7
73% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 2
35% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JT000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 108 114 111 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 109
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.5
223% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65%
Great: 80%
SDXC Card 1TB
351GB free, PID null, sandisk 1gb
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 8.7 9.7 9.7 10 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 3.5
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 8.8
10% 8.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 26%
WDC WD20 EADS-00S2B0 2TB
967GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.5 4.9 5.1 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 29.2
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 4.9
32% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
125GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 31 33 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 33.1
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 31.1
41% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U55 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback