AZW U55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAZW U55  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U55
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 103
52% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 165
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 128GB 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2012XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 36 50 65 25 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 411
Write 312
Mixed 324
SusWrite 60.6
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 15.5
87% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 39.2
79% 156 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JT000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 94 113 114 114 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 126
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 109
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
225% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%
SDXC Card 1TB
351GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 7.3 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 5.2
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 9.4
13% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 26%
WDC WD20 EADS-00S2B0 2TB
967GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 6.3 4.9 4.9 4.7 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 33.9
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 5.2
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
125GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 34 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 16.6
Write 32.5
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 31.9
42% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.6
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U55 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback