MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 652
63% 518 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80% Very good
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.8
80% 102 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 96.4
79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
507GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 1925 2010 1861 1912 1836 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 2163
Mixed 1,931
SusWrite 1,921
476% 2,118 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 98.3
320% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,175
885% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 369%
Great: 488%
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
124GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 450 449 448 451 333 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 430
Mixed 324
SusWrite 430
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 45.9
166% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 252
216% 317 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 155 149 146 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 92.3
Write 145
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 152
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
382GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 135 125 130 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 67
Write 90.1
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 128
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
145GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 87 79 86 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 49.6
Write 71.4
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 83.9
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback