MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 19:21
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 228
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 457
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 99
Reflection 109
Parallax 99.6
81% 102 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 96.9
79% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1264 1925 2134 2134 2148 1719 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2338
Write 2,330
Mixed 2,169
SusWrite 1,887
491% 2,181 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 88.6
285% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,107
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 912
684% 921 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 339%
Great: 488%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
0GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 153 169 173 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 119
Write 136
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 169
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
0GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 85 85 88 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 73.7
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 82.5
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
0GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 148 137 141 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 106
Write 137
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 136
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$37
0GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 345 349 345 346 344 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback