MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 12:53
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 678
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80% Excellent
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 108
Parallax 99.1
80% 102 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 98
Splatting 96.7
79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
507GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1991 1899 1967 1811 1864 1835 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 2,162
Mixed 1,986
SusWrite 1,894
481% 2,140 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 98.5
323% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 1,179
888% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 370%
Great: 488%
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
124GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 426 422 429 420 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 424
Mixed 320
SusWrite 425
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.3
164% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 251
216% 317 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 147 142 137 143 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 91
Write 132
Mixed 74
SusWrite 141
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
382GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 137 139 137 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 67.3
Write 78.1
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 135
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
145GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 88 87 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 53.7
Write 77
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 86.3
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback