Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 213
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 591
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 146
Parallax 195
103% 156 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 145
Splatting 98.7
97% 121 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 289 289 285 287 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 448
Mixed 415
SusWrite 290
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 57.9
193% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 362
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
103GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 460 459 449 450 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 449
Mixed 279
SusWrite 441
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 39.8
156% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 163
174% 290 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
603GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 101 99 97 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66% Good
Read 132
Write 117
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 97.5
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 79 79 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 48.1
Write 79.9
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 78.5
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback