Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 18:08
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 248
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 710
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 149
Parallax 207
109% 163 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 143
Splatting 99.3
97% 121 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 436 359 281 279 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 440
Mixed 420
SusWrite 334
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 59.4
205% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
103GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 435 434 447 443 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 468
Mixed 278
SusWrite 428
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 35.9
150% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 163
174% 289 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
603GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 99 97 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 139
Write 114
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 97.4
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 158 153 160 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 101
Write 122
Mixed 61
SusWrite 160
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 23.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback