Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 97.1 49% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 339 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 26.3 14% 21.6 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 14.3 13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 156 146 146 151 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 284 Write 207 Mixed 230 SusWrite 153 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 19.6 102% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 82.3 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 169 119% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 85%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 87GB free Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 326 324 329 339 348 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 418 Write 201 Mixed 146 SusWrite 332 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 10.8 50% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 14.3 13% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 56%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 162GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 303 327 337 344 343 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71% Very good	Read 418 Write 333 Mixed 258 SusWrite 320 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 13.7 91% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 84 92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion 3TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 756GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 92 90 91 91 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 77.1 Write 101 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 89.4 112% 81 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.8 178% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 57%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 71GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 82.7 Write 79.4 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 71.9 97% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 690GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 59 59 60 60 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34% Below average	Read 100 Write 97.4 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 59.2 98% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 53%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 950GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 74.3 Write 86.7 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 60.6 91% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB 7,092 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 17.3 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $36Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16