PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150212 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 08 '22 at 17:19 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 150 148 139 147 146 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
87GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 336 341 335 340 337 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
162GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 332 331 342 346 344 MB/s
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
786GB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 161 163 163 162 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |