Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 117
56% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 338
33% 273 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 25.7
14% 21.4 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 14.1
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 150 148 139 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65% Good
Read 234
Write 207
Mixed 224
SusWrite 148
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 36.2
127% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 166
124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
87GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 336 341 335 340 337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 419
Write 237
Mixed 176
SusWrite 335
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 10.7
50% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 14.1
13% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
162GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 332 331 342 346 344 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 425
Write 328
Mixed 256
SusWrite 334
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 13.7
91% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 81.6
92% 156 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 86%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
786GB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 161 163 163 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 159
Write 158
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 161
186% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback