Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 06:23
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 67
2-Core 124
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 331
33% 268 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 21
Parallax 26.2
14% 21.6 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 14.3
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 151 144 135 119 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 266
Write 166
Mixed 191
SusWrite 144
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 29.7
100% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 161
118% 153 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 85%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
66GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 319 309 312 285 305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 411
Write 284
Mixed 124
SusWrite 308
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 10.4
45% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 14.3
13% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
162GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 324 330 337 337 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 291
Write 330
Mixed 225
SusWrite 329
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 11.7
79% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 83.4
87% 143 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 86%
SMI USB DISK 64GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 18 4.8 17 29 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 109
Write 43
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 15.3
64% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.5
230% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 14.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback