Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 05:29
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$174
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 195
2-Core 379
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1224
122% 992 Pts
64-Core 1807
112% 1807 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 211
Parallax 203
184% 213 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1245 1636 1656 1458 1467 1486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,588
Write 2391
Mixed 1,765
SusWrite 1491
462% 2,059 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 86.8
317% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,774
DQ Write 1,355
DQ Mixed 1,320
1,054% 1,483 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 361%
Great: 410%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
119GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 374 373 367 372 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 369
Mixed 284
SusWrite 372
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 37.6
155% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 292
223% 301 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
851GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 145 146 145 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 147
Mixed 81
SusWrite 144
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 167 167 175 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 91
Write 132
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 164
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 90%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
783GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 115 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 115
Write 88
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 113
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
178% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 79%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
29GB free, PID 1220
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 39
Write 17.6
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 14.6
26% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
120% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake Co Ltd R022D408GX2-3600C18A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 42.8
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback