Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 223 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 86 88 90 90 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 358 Write 358 Mixed 228 SusWrite 85.9 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 33.9 132% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.6 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 23 34% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 104%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 299GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 87 89 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 91.7 Write 63 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 86.1 54% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB 7,477 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	57x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	51x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	13x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $454

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16