Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 119
2-Core 208
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 615
58% 484 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 205
Parallax 216
177% 213 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1074 1484 1514 1382 1410 1416 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,351
Write 2,153
Mixed 1,343
SusWrite 1,380
404% 1,807 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 85.8
279% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 934
705% 954 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
20GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 463
Mixed 431
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 60
201% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 335
251% 336 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
17GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 466
Mixed 333
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.4
196% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 327
248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
154GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 80 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 89.2
Write 80.9
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 78
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 67%
Freecom Public-Disk 500GB
12GB free, PID fc95
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 33 36 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 37.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 33.9
44% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 45%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
23GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.4 5.6 6.6 2.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Read 28.4
Write 3.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.1
11% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
86% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.5
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback