SPA LCL-508

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSPA LCL-508  (all builds)
MotherboardSPA LCL-508
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 16:50
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 400
52% 394 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Clevo(1558 653A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 18.9
16% 19.1 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 17.8
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 113 59 57 54 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 417
Write 348
Mixed 290
SusWrite 78.3
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 6.2
52% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 35.9
31% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 56%
Adata SU650NS38 480GB
373GB free
Firmware: S190802b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 437 427 435 420 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 426
Mixed 414
SusWrite 430
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 38.8
142% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 296
223% 299 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 859B CT4G4SFS824A.M8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LCL-508 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: SPA LCL-508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback