TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B75MA-G43 (MS-7798)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7798
MotherboardMSI B75MA-G43 (MS-7798)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime24 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 364
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 71.7%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3160)
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 64
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 62.7
52% 65.3 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 0.3
31% 43.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 45.1%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 328 392 305 405 327 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 331
Mixed 331
SusWrite 343
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 42.9
124% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 257
218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 91.5%
 Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
533GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 227 235 235 239 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.3% Very good
Read 248
Write 238
Mixed 239
SusWrite 230
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 38.9
126% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 72.3%
 Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 97 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 90.1
Mixed 63
SusWrite 98.3
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 55.2%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/2GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 57.5%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B75MA-G43 (MS-7798) Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B75MA-G43 (MS-7798)

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples6x
Core i7-2600Intel  $198Bench 67%, 185,630 samples2x
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples1x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples4x
RX 6600-XTAMD  $334Bench 107%, 21,558 samples2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples2x
SSD
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples2x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples1x
RAM
CMY16GX3M2B2133C11 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 029E CMY16GX3M2B2133C11 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GBUnknownBench 55%, 6 samples2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback