Shuttle SX79R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemShuttle SX79R  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FX79R
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 20:08
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 195
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 496
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 34
21% 28.1 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 25.7
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 507
Write 351
Mixed 351
89% 403 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 22.8
113% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 83.9
117% 219 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 131
Write 81
Mixed 111
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.11
45% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 92%
WD Elements 2TB
859GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 26.1
Mixed 27.1
35% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.17
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 1603, WD20EARX
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 7.88
Mixed 10.8
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.21
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
25% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 32.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX79R Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Shuttle SX79R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback