Hp-pavilion BK168AA-ABA p6404y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion BK168AA-ABA p6404y  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON VIOLET6
Memory12.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '14 at 21:34
Run Duration71 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 97.3
33% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 175
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 39% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
1.5TB free
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 142
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.22
71% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
86GB free
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 62.7
Mixed 69
51% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 57%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback