HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8597
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 21:32
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 752
80% 636 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8597) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.77 fps
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1428 427 403 370 378 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,249
Write 1,143
Mixed 806
SusWrite 567
210% 941 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 65.1
215% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 793
614% 834 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 190%
Great: 239%
Apricorn 500GB
220GB free
Firmware: 0128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 68 69 60 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 54.6
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 65.2
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35%
Great: 63%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.9 4.5 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Read 10
Write 2.7
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 4.5
5% 4.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 5%
USB2.0 FlashDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.1 4 4 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 1.3
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 4
5% 4.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback