Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9500E APU (2016 D.BR) 255 User benchmarks, average bench 35% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 46.8 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 96.9 41% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 96.3 8-Core 88.6 13% 92.4 Pts	64-Core 95.4 6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6336) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 20.9 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 17.3 14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
EXBOMSSD-25SA120G 120GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 224 274 290 269 312 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 406 Write 343 Mixed 236 SusWrite 271 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 11.9 49% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 38.2 DQ Mixed 50.9 51% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 88%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 410GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 109 126 121 120 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 123 Write 111 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 121 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WA5SD8G8C3UAZ TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.6% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 10.9 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 9.6 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	12x
Athlon 3000G Vega GraphicsAMDBench 56%, 1,067 samples	6x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	5x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	5x

RAM
AM2P26KC4U1-BADS 2x4GBAdataBench 51%, 37 samples	6x
HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 2x4GBUnknownBench 66%, 135 samples	4x
DDR4 2666 2OZ 1x8GBAdataBench 46%, 4,811 samples	3x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $172