Pcware APM-A320G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPcware APM-A320G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APM-A320G
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500E APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 97.2
41% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 97.4
8-Core 93.9
13% 95.7 Pts
64-Core 85.2
5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6336) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 17.8
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 17.2
10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXBOMSSD-25SA120G 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 146 229 148 276 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 296
Write 324
Mixed 190
SusWrite 221
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 14.4
71% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 112
98% 145 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 88%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
416GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 89 113 84 119 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 120
Write 106
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 105
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WA5SD8G8C3UAZ TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APM-A320G Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware APM-A320G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback