Pcware APM-A320G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPcware APM-A320G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APM-A320G
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 00:36
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500E APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 10.5
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 96.9
29% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 94.5
13% 96.8 Pts
64-Core 98.4
6% 98.4 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6336) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 20.9
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXBOMSSD-25SA120G 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 328 353 334 364 363 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 422
Write 351
Mixed 251
SusWrite 335
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 17.7
95% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 114
99% 145 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 88%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
410GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 127 128 119 127 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 112
Write 89.1
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 124
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WA5SD8G8C3UAZ TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 9
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 399
10% 399 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APM-A320G Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware APM-A320G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback