Pcware APM-A320G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcware APM-A320G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APM-A320G
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 23:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 639
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 21.1
12% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 20
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXBOMSSD-25SA120G 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 397 397 415 409 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 476
Write 392
Mixed 245
SusWrite 402
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 20.2
115% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 118
123% 197 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Husky 512GB 512GB
279GB free
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 438 431 442 332 9.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 500
Write 432
Mixed 430
SusWrite 346
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 24.5
128% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 34.4
80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WA5SD8G8C3UAZ TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 ETG0309 HDMI
Typical APM-A320G Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware APM-A320G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback