Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 23:04
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 757
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 310
Parallax 370
256% 331 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 260
Splatting 198
213% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 214%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,045
Write 4,686
Mixed 4,755
1,078% 4,829 MB/s
4K Read 248
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 179
694% 198 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 662
537% 765 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
223GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 323 337 318 332 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 157
Mixed 226
SusWrite 327
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 40.4
136% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 129
119% 191 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
806GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1800 1809 1746 1721 1705 1809 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,692
Write 1,830
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 1,765
433% 1,939 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 50.9
172% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 64
DQ Mixed 143
186% 359 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 290%
Great: 425%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1TB free
Firmware: S8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 315 331 313 327 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 452
Mixed 432
SusWrite 322
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 40
134% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 112
111% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
216GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 137 145 139 144 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 141
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 87%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
2TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 135 125 135 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 204
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 132
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 121%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
698GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 77 106 106 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 113
Write 63.3
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 98.7
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$124
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 141 135 140 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 138
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 138
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 42
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback