Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 23:10
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 264
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 800
83% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 317
Parallax 368
257% 333 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 261
Splatting 199
214% 272 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 214%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,840
Write 3,864
Mixed 6,404
1,266% 5,703 MB/s
4K Read 572
4K Write 341
4K Mixed 111
1,190% 341 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 940
604% 675 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
596GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2347 2426 2426 2418 2314 2045 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 2,646
Write 2,017
Mixed 1,483
SusWrite 2,329
475% 2,119 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 86.8
298% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 955
704% 935 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 382%
Great: 425%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
213GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 427 403 402 249 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 489
Mixed 410
SusWrite 405
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 62.6
210% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 269
226% 328 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 127%
Great: 126%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1TB free
Firmware: S8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 461 455 416 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 478
Mixed 452
SusWrite 450
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 63.6
208% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 144
167% 288 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 128%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
142GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 109 109 109 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 89
SusWrite 106
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 87%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 138 131 135 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 216
Mixed 95
SusWrite 134
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.9
258% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 121%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
458GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 99 100 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 60.3
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 97.5
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 63%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$124
424GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 130 132 131 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 130
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 67.1
MC Mixed 55.1
170% 59.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 26.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 150%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback