Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 244
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 853
85% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 312
Parallax 369
259% 333 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 262
Splatting 199
214% 272 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,325
Write 5,616
Mixed 5,826
1,322% 5,922 MB/s
4K Read 306
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 207
834% 238 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 814
647% 907 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
223GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 328 338 324 281 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 473
Mixed 414
SusWrite 300
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 45.4
150% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 144
128% 201 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
806GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 1985 1918 1888 1863 1840 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,766
Write 1,965
Mixed 1,492
SusWrite 1,909
454% 2033 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 58.1
194% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 145
198% 390 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 310%
Great: 425%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1TB free
Firmware: S8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 320 333 319 343 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 455
Mixed 439
SusWrite 334
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 41.4
142% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 135
124% 198 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
216GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 146 141 147 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 143
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 87%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
2TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 137 127 135 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 198
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 132
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 121%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
698GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 90 104 111 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 120
Write 53.4
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 101
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$124
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 143 138 141 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 139
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 50.1
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 25.4
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 139%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback