Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 848
87% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 313
Reflection 310
Parallax 367
255% 330 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 259
Splatting 199
213% 270 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,169
Write 6,194
Mixed 6,406
1,469% 6,590 MB/s
4K Read 614
4K Write 315
4K Mixed 132
1,266% 354 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 921
716% 994 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
596GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1943 1913 1920 1927 1927 1879 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2226
Write 1,862
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 1918
410% 1,827 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 71.8
258% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 921
686% 921 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 327%
Great: 425%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
213GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 418 414 400 402 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 424
Mixed 384
SusWrite 385
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54
182% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 266
224% 326 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1TB free
Firmware: S8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 411 412 414 409 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 398
Mixed 344
SusWrite 405
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 54
175% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 142
165% 284 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
142GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 111
Write 107
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 108
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 206 212 204 207 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 207
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 208
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
458GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 99 98 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 103
Write 51.9
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 98.8
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58%
Great: 63%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$124
424GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 131 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 111
Write 107
Mixed 61
SusWrite 131
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 51.1
159% 55.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 26.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 141%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback