Lenovo 90JL007GRS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90JL007GRS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 00:32
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 66%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 185
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 316
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 3490) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 13.7
44% 40.6 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 24
35% 45.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1136
Write 953
Mixed 723
208% 937 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 32.3
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 551
410% 547 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 247%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 154 169 175 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.4% Very good
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 164
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
29GB free
Firmware: CC6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 85 97 91 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 60.4
Write 104
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 80.6
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90JL007GRS Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 90JL007GRS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback