Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory49.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 05:48
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 950
85% 720 Pts
64-Core 2,335
144% 2,335 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 112
Parallax 116
0% 76 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 100
Splatting 86.5
84% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
466GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 488 488 488 434 352 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 489
Mixed 454
SusWrite 456
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 62.5
205% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 373
281% 374 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 129%
Great: 130%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
110GB free
Firmware: STNSC016
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,081
Write 2,413
Mixed 1,833
472% 2,109 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 63.1
164% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 869
644% 856 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 387%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 23 49 50 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 195
Write 168
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 37.2
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 36.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 35.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback