Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory50.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 946
84% 713 Pts
64-Core 2,297
142% 2,297 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.5% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 110
Parallax 116
101% 117 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 100
Splatting 86.8
85% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
466GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 489 490 492 394 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 488
Mixed 465
SusWrite 450
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 63.2
209% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 375
282% 376 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
159GB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2405 2402 851 345 344 324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 1824
Mixed 1,899
SusWrite 1,112
394% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 79.9
276% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 838
626% 835 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 278%
Great: 387%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 124 133 135 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 198
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 129
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 37.9
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback