Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory51.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 947
85% 719 Pts
64-Core 2,356
146% 2,356 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 109
Parallax 117
101% 116 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 101
Splatting 88
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
466GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 491 489 490 442 353 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 461
SusWrite 457
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 63.1
210% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 373
281% 374 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 131%
Great: 130%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
159GB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2403 2134 485 437 482 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2057
Write 1,855
Mixed 1,911
SusWrite 1,064
387% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 79.7
263% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 857
636% 847 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 267%
Great: 387%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 129 84 89 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 177
Write 190
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 104
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 38.4
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $749
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback