HP Compaq ms6200 MultiSeat SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq ms6200 MultiSeat SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 10:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 322
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Gainward(10B0 0401) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 239 222 233 231 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.1% Good
Read 251
Write 218
Mixed 212
SusWrite 235
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 32.3
106% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 164
130% 182 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 118%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
417GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 445 438 445 433 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 416
Write 146
Mixed 342
SusWrite 443
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 28.6
100% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 168
157% 239 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
454GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 130 127 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 119
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 130
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq ms6200 MultiSeat SFF PC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq ms6200 MultiSeat SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback