Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JB
Memory31.1 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 613
67% 528 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 80%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 183F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 17.7
14% 16 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 18.6
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 20 75 7.2 8.3 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 406
Write 312
Mixed 300
SusWrite 28.7
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 20.7
94% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 35.6
66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
562GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 131 134 134 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
244% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 35GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback