Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JB
Memory28.1 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 14:22
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 231
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 592
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 183F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 17.9
14% 15.5 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 0.2
7% 9.73 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 122 12 81 16 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 399
Write 332
Mixed 274
SusWrite 42.5
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 23.3
111% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 0.5
42% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 114 113 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 113
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 112
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
209% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 35GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback