Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JB
Memory31 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 01:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 583
69% 532 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 183F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 16.2
13% 14.9 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 18.9
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 19 78 17 26 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 424
Write 310
Mixed 309
SusWrite 58.1
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 20.1
97% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 67.7
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 33.8
63% 118 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
562GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 130 133 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 127
Mixed 55
SusWrite 133
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
244% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 35GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback