Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JB
Memory	30.7 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '21 at 18:36
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 132 2-Core 260 84% 155 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 612 66% 527 Pts	64-Core 620 38% 620 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 183F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 6.7 6% 8.4 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 8.1 8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 341 334 318 322 332 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 399 Write 297 Mixed 295 SusWrite 324 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 23.3 126% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 65.5 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 36.8 68% 129 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 81%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 911GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 119 119 115 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 141 Write 135 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 116 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 35GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 32767 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.2% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.1 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22.1 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	215x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	109x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	56x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	182x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	122x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	76x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	46x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	32x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	146x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	87x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16