Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 181 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 332 42% 319 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 339A) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 240GB 1,366 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 216 77 79 79 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 458 Write 406 Mixed 357 SusWrite 152 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 30.5 101% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 231 197% 289 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 93%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 635GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 141 143 142 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 116 Write 117 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 141 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 6GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	420x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	130x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87