HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161005
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 18:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 339
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 240GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 211 82 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 454
Write 412
Mixed 359
SusWrite 151
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 32.9
110% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 230
198% 290 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 93%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
700GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 143 143 143 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 125
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback