ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '21 at 12:03
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 136 2-Core 229 88% 153 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 696 73% 584 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Lighting 85.5 Reflection 128 Parallax 80.4 70% 98.1 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 79.6 Splatting 73 67% 83.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 117 113 112 114 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 912 Write 123 Mixed 155 SusWrite 115 70% 326 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 94.8 4K Mixed 37.1 148% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 159 126% 179 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 335GB free Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1931 1724 1727 1115 1257 1129 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,022 Write 2,188 Mixed 1,751 SusWrite 1,480 419% 1,861 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 64.5 220% 80.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,130 DQ Write 750 DQ Mixed 913 688% 931 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 347%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 23.3 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 27.8 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	459x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	249x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	212x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	83x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	208x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback