Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer OL510
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 269
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 683
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.8% Good
Lighting 85.8
Reflection 128
Parallax 79.7
70% 97.8 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 73.5
67% 82.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 674 205 155 147 143 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 1,178
Write 907
Mixed 895
SusWrite 242
180% 805 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.4
206% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 576
442% 591 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
569GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 1727 1729 1729 1728 1731 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 2,215
Mixed 1,711
SusWrite 1,776
433% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 65.1
222% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 951
708% 949 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 298%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 23
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 120 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08FB
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback