Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 08:43
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 272 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 729 77% 614 Pts	64-Core 905 56% 905 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7168 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.4% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 128 Parallax 79.4 70% 97.6 fps	MRender 95.4 Gravity 78.5 Splatting 72.8 66% 82.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 213 145 147 143 138 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 1,200 Write 921 Mixed 905 SusWrite 231 181% 814 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 61.3 207% 73.4 MB/s	DQ Read 480 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 570 441% 593 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 569GB free Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2023 1731 1729 1731 1733 1731 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 1983 Write 2,167 Mixed 1,731 SusWrite 1,780 432% 1,915 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 64.7 222% 80.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1172 DQ Write 778 DQ Mixed 988 734% 979 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 347%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 23.1 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 26 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	120	15.5"	1280 720	BOE08FB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	456x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	248x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	205x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16