ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Predator G3-572 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienta_KLS
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170428
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 14:09
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 532 57% 455 Pts	64-Core 532 33% 532 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 118A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4691 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 26.9 Parallax 7.44 6% 14 fps	MRender 9.38 Gravity 7.07 Splatting 15.7 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2687006 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 29 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 154 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 48 206159937575 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 34359738376 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 135 (EA) Unknown 100 100 228 (F1) Unknown 253 253 208 (F2) Unknown 253 253 118 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	62% Good	Read 474 Write 315 Mixed 310 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 7.9 43% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 43.5 89% 184 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 735GB free Firmware: AX1P5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1705 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 404 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 45 (0A) Spinup retry count 107 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 48 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 479 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864839196 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 10 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 190 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.9% Good	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 102 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.21 66% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 121 Write 7.66 Mixed 11.8 37% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.36 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.04 19% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 04CB 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 16.5 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 18 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,063x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	347x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	761x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	447x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	202x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	345x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	182x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	65x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	156x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	123x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback