Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 183
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 394
47% 364 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 36.7
35% 37.1 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 36.2
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDLF1DAR-960G-1JA2 960GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZR07RP91
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 303 307 302 272 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 267
Write 306
Mixed 279
SusWrite 287
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 31.3
102% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 225
177% 245 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 23.5
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback