Onsor Turs

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOnsor Turs  (all builds)
MotherboardOnsor Turs-bb01-T
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2240 x 1400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 270
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 552
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 27.8
18% 25.6 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 21.5
21% 26.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H2.16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 968 911 1127 1147 1148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,695
Write 1,147
Mixed 722
SusWrite 1,035
256% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 23.9
157% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 80.2
127% 242 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 191%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 29.4
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 17.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Turs Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Onsor Turs

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback